Robots vs. jobs: IFR refutes MIT economist

robot and engineer

Robots vs jobs is a debate as old as time. MIT economist Daron Acemoglu recently added some fuel to the fire with his three-part series that puts a number on the job costs of automation. The International Federation of Robotics (IFR) is now pushing back, calling Acemoglu’s research “wrong.”

The post Robots vs. jobs: IFR refutes MIT economist appeared first on The Robot Report.

More Related Posts

QIS Project Shows Novel Method for Privacy-Preserving Quantum ML

Quantum computing holds the promise of greatly advancing computational capabilities, and programs...

AI-augmented HPC and the Inflation of Science and Technology

In the universe of numeric computation, one way to predict the future...

How Oxide Created a Cloud Server by Stripping Components, Wires, Cables, and Chips

Hyperscalers Google, Amazon, and Meta have developed barebones servers by stripping down...

Home

Highly Niched Headhunters Specialized in Physical AI/Robotics, High-Performance Computing, Unmanned/Autonomous Systems, Defense Technology and Energy.

Specializations

We recruit across complex engineering markets where understanding the technology is critical to finding the right talent.

How We Work

Overview of how PACE partners with teams: Our process, what clients get, and why PACE is different.

About Us

PACE’s story, values, and culture define how we operate and who we are.

News & Insights

Stay up to date on industry trends.

Contact

All the information needed for anyone interested in contacting us.